To download a pdf of this graphic, please click here.
This page has resources designed to help you critically evaluate your resources and be on the lookout for fake news. Every information consumer has the responsibility to be critical of sources, check the facts and use information ethically.
This quick video from University of Houston Libraries walks you through some of the major differences between scholarly and popular sources.
Scholarly Sources
|
Popular Sources
|
|
---|---|---|
Purpose |
Share results of research with other scholars |
Broad appeal Entertain Sell products |
Audience |
Researchers Academic faculty Students |
General public |
Authors |
Scholars and researchers Experts in the field |
Journalists Featured writers |
Publisher |
Scholarly Publishers Professional Associations University Presses |
Commercial publishers Media organizations
|
Appearance |
Basic layout Usually black text on white paper Tables or charts |
Colored text or headlines Eye-catching layouts Usually has accompanying photographs Advertisements |
Article Acceptance |
Peer-reviewed by experts in the field |
Writers usually employed by the media organization or freelance writers |
Article Length |
Often lengthy (approximately 10-30 pages) |
Often short (approximately 1-10 pages) |
Article Language |
College-level Specialized vocabulary or jargon of the discipline |
Non-technical Conversational/simple vocabulary |
Organization & References |
Highly-structured Include abstracts, review of the literature, methodology, and citations to sources Always contains a bibliography of references |
Loosely-structured Rarely have bibliographies Sometimes informally mention sources |
Examples |
American Journal of Political Science Policy Studies Review |
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report Time |
From Cornell College's "A Guide to Evaluating Resources"
The CRAAP Test is a checklist of questions you can use to help you evaluate any sources you come across. Depending on your information need, different criteria will be more or less important.
Evaluation Criteria
Currency: The timeliness of the information.
When was the information published or posted?
Has the information been revised or updated?
Does your topic require current information, or will older sources work as well?
Are the links functional?
Relevance: The importance of the information for your needs.
Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question?
Who is the intended audience?
Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)?
Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is the one you will use?
Would you be comfortable citing this source in your research paper?
Authority: The source of the information.
Who is the author / publisher / source / sponsor?
What are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations?
Is the author qualified to write on the topic?
Is there contact information, such as a publisher or email address?
Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source (examples: .com .edu .gov .org .net)?
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the content.
Where does the information come from?
Is the information supported by evidence?
Has the information been reviewed or refereed?
Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge?
Does the language or tone seem unbiased and free of emotion?
Are there spelling, grammar or typographical errors?
Purpose: The reason the information exists.
What is the purpose of the information? Is it to inform, teach, sell, entertain or persuade?
Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear?
Is the information fact, opinion or propaganda?
Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional or personal biases?
The CRAAP Test was originally developed at California State University at Chico. Here's a link to their guide.